Weekly
Alert
May 9,
2007
Add Your Name to
our Directory of Internet Lawyers
Latest
News
· Intellectual Property
· Internet
Commerce
·
Freedom of
Speech
·
Telecommunications
· Privacy & Security
·
Taxation
·
Jurisdiction
& Procedure
Latest
Cases
Latest
Pleadings, Motions, & Briefs
Latest Research from Pike & Fischer
Events &
Conferences
Subscription Information
Add
Your Name to Our Directory of Internet Lawyers
Pike &
Fischer has created The Internet Law
Attorney Directory to assist
site visitors who submit legal questions to ILR editors. Since Pike &
Fischer cannot offer legal advice, we refer inquiring parties to this
exclusive listing of Internet law practitioners. It's also a great
place to start networking with your colleagues! Our Directory
displays basic contact information with an optional link to your online
biography.
Care to
join the Directory? ILR subscribers are entitled to one
complimentary premium listing per account. Additional listings
and listings by non-subscribers can be purchased for $49.99 (or $69.99 for
a premium boldfaced listing). Use this
form to submit your complimentary
or paid listing today!

Latest News
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY
Suit Alleging Massive Copyright Infringement on
YouTube Site Seeks Class Action Status
Operators of the YouTube video-sharing web
site are deliberately engaging in, and facilitating, copyright
infringement by others on a massive scale, according to a complaint filed
May 4 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New
York. The complaint takes as its starting point the well-known fact
that a considerable amount of copyrighted material finds its way onto the
YouTube web site. According to the plaintiffs, a broadcaster of
English soccer games and a music publisher, YouTube encourages the
copyright infringement that occurs on its site and refrains from
implementing readily available technical measures to prevent such
infringement. Football Association Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube,
Inc. (Class Action Complaint), 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1806.
Read more ...
Other
Intellectual Property news:
·
Royalty Board Finalizes Webcasting Royalties Following Failed
Appeal, Congressional Action
· Court Refuses to Vacate Vonage Infringement Verdict Based on High
Court's KSR Ruling
· PTO Issues a Staff Memo in Response to High Court's KSR
Ruling
· SoundExchange to Audit 2005 Filings on Digital Audio Transmissions
by Microsoft
· Utah Delays Implementation of Law Establishing Electronic
Registration Mark
Search ILR's Intellectual Property database

INTERNET COMMERCE
U.S. Alters Services Schedule to Avoid Ruling on
Gambling, Refuses Antigua Compensation
The United States announced May 4 that it
will be modifying its World Trade Organization schedule of services
commitments to specifically rule out any market access commitments on
gambling services and to correct what U.S. officials described as a
drafting "oversight" made towards the conclusion of the Uruguay Round in
1993. U.S. officials said the move was the only option available to
the United States in order to bring Washington in compliance with a WTO
dispute ruling condemning U.S. restrictions on cross-border Internet
gambling. Read more ...
Other Internet
Commerce news:
·
Electronic Payment Processing Company to End Online Tobacco Work,
Cuomo Says
· Visual Web Site Must Impede Blind Users' Access to Physical Store
to Satisfy ADA Class
· Whois Data Accuracy Program to Allow ICANN Audits
· Alabama Lawyers May Not Mine 'Metadata' Hidden Inside
E-Documents
Search ILR's Internet Commerce
database

FREEDOM OF
SPEECH
Single Publication Rule Applicable in Civil Rights
Challenge to Online Discipline Reports
The statute of limitations for a civil rights
claim arising from online material begins on the date the material is
first available online, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
held May 3. The logic of the single publication rule—developed in
the context of state defamation claims—applies to a federal civil rights
action stemming from content posted online, the court reasoned. Along the
way, it also held that allegedly unlawful material is not republished
merely by remaining available for viewing, or by minor changes in the URL
at the same second-level domain. Canatella v. Van de Kamp, 2007
ILRWeb (P&F) 1803. Read more ...
Other
Freedom of Speech news:
· Louisiana Liable for Attorneys' Fees After Video Game Law Deemed
Unconstitutional
· Self-Titled 'Spam Fighter' Found Liable for Millions in Marketer's
Defamation Lawsuit
Search ILR's Freedom of Speech
database

TELECOMMUNICATIONS
New York Legislators Consider Measure to Prohibit
Packet Discrimination by Telcos
The state Assembly is considering a bill (A. 3980) to
establish "net neutrality" in New York state, as part of a sweeping
measure to regulate the telecommunications and cable industries. The
bill, which is before the Corporations, Authorities, and Commissions
Committee, would prohibit networks from favoring one particular network
destination or class of applications over another. "Although the
federal government has eliminated net neutrality rules, the state has
every right and obligation to build this important consumer protection in
as a condition of a new model of cable and broadband deployment," the
sponsors of the bills said in a memo supporting the legislation.
Read more ...
Other
Telecommunications news:
· Federal-State Joint Board Urges FCC to Adopt Cap on USF
Support
· At Music Policy Event, User Advocates Make Case for Net Neutrality
Protections
· Verizon's Policy Agenda Includes Broadband, Spectrum Rules, USF
Reform
Search ILR's Telecommunications database

PRIVACY & SECURITY
No Protected Privacy Interest in P2P User's IP
Address When Visible on Network
A peer-to-peer network user whose Internet protocol address
is visible to anyone using ordinary Internet software lacks a privacy
interest in that address, even if the user has his or her file-sharing
option switched off, the Minnesota Court of Appeals held April 17 in an
unpublished decision. After reading the IP address of a P2P network
user, an officer subpoenaed the hosting Internet service provider for the
user's name and address, where officers later recovered a substantial
amount of computer disk-stored pornography. The user argued that
this evidence should have been suppressed, because the officers only
discovered his address through an illegal search. The court
disagreed. State of Minnesota v. Jacobs, 2007 ILRWeb
(P&F) 1659. Read more ...
Other Privacy
& Security news:
· House Judiciary Committee Moves Measure to Punish 'Spyware'
Activities
· Privacy Advocates Urge Congress to Reject White House Wiretap
Bill
· Senate Judiciary Approves Bill to Raise Private Sector Data
Security
· Rep. Davis Reintroduces Federal Agencies Data Security Bill
Requiring Breach Notice
· Tech Groups Object to Senate Proposal to Create DHS Preparedness
Standards
· Pennsylvania Senate Committee Moves Spyware Bill with Civil,
Criminal Penalties
· EU Law Enforcement Data Sharing Proposal Insufficient, EU Data
Protection Chief Says
Search ILR's Privacy & Security database

TAXATION
Virginia Tax Commissioner Says Distribution Center
Located in State Does Not Create Nexus
The establishment of a distribution center in
Virginia would not create taxable nexus for a retailer, the Virginia Tax
Commissioner has ruled. The commissioner concluded that there was no nexus
with Virginia because the retailer would have no property in Virginia, and
its business activities in Virginia were not sufficient to establish
nexus. The taxpayer operates retail web sites, and sales of the
products are handled by a retailer. Virginia Tax
Commissioner Ruling PD 07-24, 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1551.
Read more ...
Search ILR's Taxation database

JURISDICTION & PROCEDURE
E-Mail, Other Electronically Stored Data Should Be
Given Strict Evidentiary Vetting
Photocopies of printed e-mails were not admissible as
evidence when offered without authentication and without consideration for
the hearsay, original writing, and prejudice balancing considerations
required by the Federal Rules of Evidence, a magistrate judge for the U.S.
District Court for the District of Maryland held May 4. The
magistrate undertook an expansive discussion of the admissibility of
electronically stored information, and along the way determined that the
e-mail messages offered here failed all of the requirements. The e-mails
were merely attached to a summary judgment motion, the court said, and the
parties made no attempt to demonstrate their admissibility under federal
evidence standards. Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co.,
2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1805. Read more ...
Other
Jurisdiction & Procedure news:
· Allegedly Infringing Web Site Not Purposeful Availment Absent
Actual Commercial Dealings
· Web Site 'Interactivity' Irrelevant When Assessing Jurisdiction
Arising from Ad Site
Search ILR's Jurisdiction & Procedure
database

Latest Cases
· Alabama State Bar
Ethics Opinion RO-2007-02, 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1553 [Ala St Bar]
(Alabama lawyers may not mine 'metadata' hidden inside e-documents)
· Canatella v. Van de Kamp, 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1803 [9th Cir]
(Single publication rule bars claim based on attorney disciplinary record
posted on state bar's web site)
· Creative Cash Flow
Solutions, Inc., In re (Assurance of Discontinuance), 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1661 [NY Att'y Gen]
(Electronic payment processing company to end online tobacco work)
· Digital Performance Right in Sound Recordings and
Ephemeral Recordings (Final Rule and Order), 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1801 [Copyright
Royalty Board] (Royalty board finalizes webcasting royalties following
failed appeal, congressional action)
· Entertainment
Software Association v. Foti, 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1671 [MD La]
(Louisiana liable for attorneys' fees after video game law deemed
unconstitutional)
· GTX Global Corp. v. Left,
2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1807 [Cal Ct App]
(Blogger, sued for defamation, wins anti-SLAPP motion)
·
Howard v. Missouri Bone and Joint Center, Inc., 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1675 [Ill App Ct]
(Web site 'interactivity' irrelevant when assessing jurisdiction arising
from ad site)
· IO Group, Inc. v. Veoh Networks,
Inc., 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1655 [ND Cal] (Web
site traffic information is relevant or reasonably calculated to lead to
the discovery of admissible evidence as to the "direct financial benefit,"
if any, defendant obtained from the alleged infringing activity)
· Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance Co.,
2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1805 [D Md] (E-mail,
other electronically stored data should be given strict evidentiary
vetting)
· Minnesota, State of v. Jacobs,
2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1659 [Minn Ct App]
(No protected privacy interest in P2P user's IP address when visible on
network)
· National Federation of the Blind v. Target
Corp., 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1667 [ND Cal] (Visual
web site must impede blind users' access to physical store to satisfy ADA
class)
· Service Rules for the 698-746, 747-762 and
777-792 MHz Bands, In re, 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1673 [FCC]
(Commission addresses rules governing wireless licenses in the 700 MHz
Band)
· Static Control Components, Inc. v. Lexmark
International, Inc., 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1663 [ED Ky] (Motion
for summary judgment of direct infringement granted in part and denied in
part)
· Tewart Enterprises, Inc. v. Dawson,
2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1669 [SD Ohio]
(Allegedly infringing web site not purposeful availment absent actual
commercial dealings)
· Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage
Holdings Corp., 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1657 [Fed Cir] (Order
granting motion for stay)
· Verizon Services Corp. v.
Vonage Holdings Corp., 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1665 [ED Va]
(Permanent Injunction)
· Virginia Tax Commissioner
Ruling PD 07-24, 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1551 [Va Tax Comm'r]
(Distribution center located in state does not create nexus)
Search ILR's Cases database

Latest Pleadings, Motions, & Briefs
·
Football Association Premier League Ltd. v. YouTube, Inc. (Class
Action Complaint), 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1806 [SD NY] (Class
action copyright infringement lawsuit filed by British football league and
American music publisher against YouTube)
·
Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp. (Motion to Vacate
& Remand), 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1802 [Fed Cir]
(Vonage asks for remand in light of Supreme Court's ruling in KSR
International Co. v. Teleflex, Inc.)
·
Verizon Services Corp. v. Vonage Holdings Corp. (Opposition to
Motion to Vacate & Remand), 2007 ILRWeb (P&F) 1804 [Fed
Cir]
Search ILR's Pleadings database

Latest Research from Pike
& Fischer
Cable Commercial-Services
Strategies
The nation's
top cable operators are launching a long-anticipated push to develop and
broadly deploy a commercial services portfolio focused on the small and
mid-sized business (SMB) segment. In attacking this multibillion dollar
opportunity, the cable companies have fundamental decisions to make
regarding technology solutions, the types of customers to target, the
channel partners they will leverage in reaching those customers, and
service portfolios to market through those channels. This 30+ page
report provides an overview of the commercial services strategies of the
leading U.S. cable operators, analyzes their existing and emerging
capabilities, and details the critical success factors for the cable
industry in targeting the SMB opportunity.
Special
Offers
Purchase the report and attend the May 23rd audio event
Order Now
Learn More about the audio
event
Purchase the report and schedule a 1-hr.
briefing with Chief Analyst Tim McElgunn. Order
Now
Purchase the
report, attend the May 23rd audio event and schedule a briefing
Order Now
Verizon vs. Vonage: What It Means for Residential VoIP
Service
On March
8th, a federal jury found that Vonage Holdings infringed on three
Verizon patents, fueling speculation that the company could have to shut
down its VoIP service. This report analyzes the impact that this
case will have on Vonage as well as other independent VoIP providers, and
explains why the jury verdict will generate increased adoption of cable
phone service. Order Now
View all Market
Research Reports & Briefs

Events & Conferences
Broadband Policy
Summit III: Group Rates Available
June 7-8, 2007 -
The Ritz-Carlton Pentagon City, Arlington, VA
Don't miss
this opportunity to hear from top policymakers and industry leaders from
Congress, the FCC, NTIA, State Commissions, cable operators, telcos,
content providers, equipment manufacturers, and law firms. You'll
learn how technology advancements, policy developments, and changing
business models are shaping the future of the industry.
Does
your organization have more than one professional interested in
attending? Ask about our
group rates.
Download
Brochure Register
Now
View all Events
& Conferences

Subscription Information
In
order to receive your own copy of Internet Law & Regulation's
Weekly Alert, please fill out the Weekly Alert sign-up form.
Also, invite colleagues to request a trial to ILR. For additional
information, contact customercare@pf.com.
To unsubscribe, do not reply to this
message. Instead, please use the unsubscribe feature at the bottom of this
email.